Observation: Solid Food Article
It was more than fifteen years ago that I entered the laboratory of Professor
Agassiz, and told him I had enrolled my name in the scientific school as a student of natural history.
He asked me a few questions about my object in coming, my antecedents generally, the mode in which
I afterwards proposed to use the knowledge I might acquire, and finally, whether I wished to study
any special branch. To the later I replied that while I wished to be well-grounded in all departments
of zoology, I purposed to devote myself specifically to insects.
When do you wish to begin?" he asked.
"Now," I replied.
This seemed to please him, and with an energetic, "Very well," he reached
from a shelf a huge jar of specimens in yellow alcohol.
"Take this fish," he said, "and look at it; we call it a Haemulon;
by and by I will ask what you have seen."
With that he left me, but in a moment returned with explicit instructions as to
the care of the object entrusted to me.
"No man is fit to be a naturalist," said he, "who does not know how
to take care of specimens."
I was to keep the fish before me in a tin tray, and occasionally moisten the surface
with alcohol from the jar, always taking care to replace the stopper tightly. Those were not the days
of ground glass stoppers, and elegantly shaped exhibition jars; all the old students will recall
the huge, neckless glass bottles with their leaky, wax-besmeared corks, half-eaten by insects and
begrimed with cellar dust. Entomology was a cleaner science than ichthyology, but the example of
the professor who had unhesitatingly plunged to the bottom of the jar to produce the fish was infectious;
and though this alcohol had "a very ancient and fish-like smell," I really dared not show
any aversion within these sacred precincts, and treated the alcohol as though it were pure water.
Still, I was conscious of a passing feeling of disappointment, for gazing at a fish did not comment
itself to an ardent entomologist. My friends at home, too, were annoyed, when they discovered that
no amount of eau de cologne would drown the perfume which haunted me like a shadow.
"In ten minutes I had seen all that could be seen in that fish, and started
in search of the professor, who had, however, left the museum; and when I returned, after lingering
over some of the odd animals stored in the upper apartment, my specimen was dry all over. I dashed
the fluid over the fish as if to resuscitate it from a fainting-fit, and I looked with anxiety for
a return of a normal, sloppy appearance. This little excitement over, nothing was to be done but
return to a steadfast gaze at my mute companion. Half and hour passed, and hour, another hour; the
fish began to look loathsome. I turned it over and around; looked it in the face -ghastly; from
behind, beneath, above, sideways, as a three-quarters view -just as ghastly. I was in despair; at
an early hour I concluded that lunch was necessary; so with infinite relief, the fish was carefully
replaced in the jar, and for an hour I was free.
On my return, I learned that Professor Agassiz had been at the museum, but had
gone and would not return for several hours. My fellow students were too busy to be disturbed by
continued conversation. Slowly I drew forth that hideous fish, and with a feeling of desperation
again looked at it. I might not use a magnifying glass; instruments of all kinds were interdicted.
My two hands, my two eyes, and the fish; it seemed a most limited field. I pushed my fingers down
its throat to see how sharp its teeth were. I began to count the scales in the different rows until
I was convinced that that was nonsense. At last a happy thought struck me -I would draw the fish;
and now with surprise I began to discover new features in the creature. Just then the professor
"That is right," said he, "a pencil is one of the best eyes. I am
glad to notice, too, that you keep your specimen wet and your bottle corked."
With these encouraging words he added, "Well, what is it like?"
He listened attentively to my brief rehearsal of the structure of parts whose names
were still unknown to me; the fringed gill-arches and moveable operculum; the pores of the head,
fleshy lips, and lidless eyes; the lateral line, the spinous fin, and forked tail; the compressed
and arched body. When I had finished, he waited as if expecting more, and then with an air of disappointment:
"You have not looked very carefully; why," he continued, more earnestly,
"you haven't seen one of the most conspicuous features of the animal, which is as plainly before
your eyes as the fish itself. Look again; look again." And he left me to my misery.
I was piqued; I was mortified. Still more of that wretched fish? But now I set
myself to the task with a will, and discovered one new thing after another, until I saw how just
the professor's criticism had been. The afternoon passed quickly, and towards its close, the professor
inquired, "Do you see it yet?"
"No," I replied. "I am certain I do not, but I see how little I saw
"That is next best," said he earnestly, "but I won't hear you now;
put away your fish and go home; perhaps you will be ready with a better answer in the morning. I
will examine you before you look at the fish."
This was disconcerting; not only must I think of my fish all night, studying,
without the object before me, what this unknown but most visible feature might be, but also, without
reviewing my new discoveries I must give an exact account of them the next day. I had a bad memory,
so I walked home by the Charles River in a distracted state, with my two perplexities.
The cordial greeting from the professor the next morning was reassuring: here was
a man who seemed to be quite as anxious as I that I should see for myself what he saw.
"Do you perhaps mean," I asked, "that the fish has symmetrical sides
with paired organs?"
His thoroughly pleased, "Of course, of course!" repaid the wakeful hours
of the previous night. After he had discoursed most happily and enthusiastically -as he always
did -upon the importance of this point, I ventured to ask what I should do next.
"Oh, look at your fish!" he said, and left me again to my own devices.
In a little more than an hour he returned and heard my new catalogue.
"That is good, that is good!" he repeated, "But that is not all;
go on." And so for three long days, he placed that fish before my eyes, forbidding me to look
at anything else, or to use any artificial aid. "Look, look, look," was his repeated injunction.
This was the best entomological lesson I ever had -a lesson whose influence has
extended to the details of every subsequent study; a legacy the professor has left me, as he left
it to many others, of inestimable value, which we could not buy, with which we cannot part.
A year afterwards, some of us were amusing ourselves with chalking outlandish beasts
upon the blackboard. We drew prancing star-fishes; frogs in mortal combat; hydra-headed worms; stately
craw-fishes, standing on their tails, bearing aloft umbrellas; and grotesque fishes, with gaping
mouths and staring eyes. The professor came in shortly after, and was as much amused as any at our
experiments. He looked at the fishes. "Haemulons, every one of them," he said; "Mr.
______ drew them."
True; and to this day, if I attempt a fish, I can draw nothing but Haemulons.
The fourth day a second fish of the same group was placed beside the first, and I
was bidden to point out the resemblances and differences between the two; another and another followed,
until the entire family lay before me, and a whole legion of jars covered the table and surrounding
shelves; the odor had become a pleasant perfume; and even now, the sight of an old six-inch worm-eaten
cork brings fragrant memories!
The whole group of Haemulons was thus brought into review; and whether engaged
upon the dissection of the internal organs, preparation and examination of the bony framework, or
the description of the various parts, Agassiz's training in the method of observing facts in their
orderly arrangement was ever accompanied by the urgent exhortation not to be content with them.
"Facts are stupid things," he would say, "until brought into connection
with some general law."
At the end of eight months, it was almost with reluctance that I left these friends
and turned to insects; but what I gained by this outside experience has been of greater value than
years of later investigation in my favorite groups.
Reprinted from Paul Cox's Solid Food Study Guide. Author Unknown
If you find this page by itself, you can learn more about it and its context by clicking our URL here,
and it will take you to the page that it is associated with.
A resource for learning how to read the Bible.